SECTION XIII - APPENDICES

    Appendix A - NOAA TASK STATEMENT
    Appendix B - RECOMMENDED BUDGET for FYs1998 and 1999
    Appendix C - ANALYSIS of NOAA/NWS LABOR MODEL
    Appendix D - CONTACTS 81Appendix E - ACRONYMS
     

Appendix A - NOAA TASK STATEMENT

Report /Mission:

In the next few months, NOAA and the Department of Commerce will need to determine the level of resources needed to operate the modernized National Weather Service (NWS). This report is required in a short time frame to assist NOAA and the Department in making resource allocation decisions for the FY 1998 NWS operating plan. NOAA and the Department of Commerce will need to understand the programmatic impact of the FY 1998 conference allocation for the National Weather Service and determine if additional resources are required to meet the criteria defined in the assumptions. In addition, resource information is needed for the FY 1999 Departmental budget request to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to ensure that the criteria defined in the assumptions can be supported.

Recognizing that this time frame is short, we are requesting that the report contain sufficient analysis to determine the necessary resources, or indicate major areas of uncertainty and provide proposals on how to address those issues, consistent with the criteria defined in the assumptions. General Kelly is requested to provide an analysis and recommendations distinguishing between issues which need to resolved in the short term (e.g., FY 1998) and those which are longer term (e.g., FY 1999 and beyond).

In particular, General Kelly should provide an assessment of issues associated with AWIPS functionality and staffing levels (including reductions) and NWS closure plans. He also is requested to analyze the operational regional infrastructure of the NWS as it affects the cost of delivery of services, with specific focus on the NWS plans to accelerate the closure of the Southern Region Headquarters.

Approach:

General Kelly will receive briefings as well as other requested information from NWS and other relevant parties (see Assumptions section). In addition, it is expected that General Kelly will meet with users of NWS products and services to include government and non­government groups and other interested parties such as state emergency managers, commercial weather service providers, and the National Research Council's NWS Modernization Committee, to discuss parameters which would affect the cost of weather service operations, such as timeliness, accuracy, responsiveness, communication and others.

General Kelly should assess the zero­based budget review information which will be provided by the NWS to establish a baseline cost determination of the existing programs. This assessment should consider the costs associated with:

the current and projected staffing plan; (and, in particular, whether the FY 1998 President's budget is adequate to support this; and what resources are needed in FY 1999);

the current and planned modernized field office operations;

the current and planned modernized weather office infrastructure, including the regional headquarters; and

recurring requirements such as operations and maintenance, research and development, technology refreshment, service and product improvement, and training needs.

Outside Experts:

We recommend that General Kelly contact the following people as soon as possible to develop a work plan which would take advantage of their expertise. In parallel, we will contact them to discuss the specific arrangements necessary to provide for their participation in this effort. One possible work plan and personnel assignment could be built upon the following:

Good - technology infusion - plans for both phasing and level of resources

Dutton - identify a priority list of issues which are important to the academic community

McMillion - identify a priority list of concerns with respect to weather services and emergency manager needs;

Dorman - review the cost of planned service and product improvements

Kaehn - assist in the evaluation of the NWS regional infrastructure, specifically focusing on NWS plans to accelerate the closure of the Southern Region Headquarters; and provide an assessment of issues associated with AWIPS functionality and staffing levels (including reductions)/NWS closure plans

NOAA Support:

NOAA will provide access to all information that is required to conduct this assessment, including briefing materials, budget and cost information, GAO and IG reports, staffing and modernization plans, and all other relevant documentation. NOAA will ensure that appropriate NOAA staff are made available to General Kelly for his support , including administrative and clerical, budget, technical and program management. Specific NOAA individuals that General Kelly has identified are being contacted to ascertain their availability.

NOAA will also arrange access to other appropriate government and non­government officials. We anticipate that briefings to Congressional staff will be necessary and NOAA will make the necessary arrangements for these meetings.

Office space in NOAA facilities in Silver Spring has been made available. NOAA will also pay for authorized travel, phones, fax, computer and other required support. NOAA will make appropriate arrangements to acquire additional support from contractors for budget or technical analysis expertise, if required.

Assumptions:

For purposes of preparing this report, General Kelly should base his analysis and recommendations or options on the following assumptions regarding the baseline for NWS modernization and service levels (detailed briefings will be provided to him on this):

FY 1996 current level of services and products, adjusted for permanent changes made as part of the FY 1997 budget shortfall, will continue in FY 1998­1999;

NWS modernization plan will be pursued and completed as currently defined and scheduled in he National Implementation Plan;

Staffing plan will be implemented as defined in the Human Resources staffing plan, adjusted for actions undertake in FY 1997 as part of the NWS streamlining plan;

NWS budget profiles defined in the President's FY 1998 budget request and run­outs, adjusted for Congressional actions;

Guidance established to address the FY 1997 budget situation can continue to be supported in FY 1998­1999. The guidance for FY 1997 is: (1) no direct impact on warning programs; (2) no reductions to modernization systems and schedules; and (3) no permanent staffing reductions in weather forecast offices and river forecast centers.

Deliverable and Time Frame:

A report is request that will contain an assessment of the fiscal resources necessary to operate the modernized weather service, as defined in the National Implementation Plan, focusing on resource requirements for FY 1998 and FY 1999. The report should identify major cost uncertainties associated with the end state of modernization and provide recommendations and/or options on how to proceed with addressing these issues. The report will be due to the Under Secretary and the Secretary of Commerce 60­days from General Kelly's entry-on-duty (EOD) as a limited term SES appointment which will run for 90 days.

REPORT OUTLINE

I. Scope

II. Approach

III. Methodology

IV. Assumptions

V. Cost Analysis

Determination of the level of resources needed in FY 1998 and FY 1999 to proceed on schedule with weather service modernization and ensure that the current levels of services are supported, to include the cost of the following recurring fiscal requirements:

  • Operations and maintenance
  • Current and projected staffing plan
  • Infrastructure to support current level of services and to meet modernization as defined in NIP
  • Research and development
  • Technology refreshment and infusion (both phasing and level of resources)
  • Service and product improvement (including addressing concerns identified by the emergency management community)
    Training

VI. Specific Issues

  • Assessment of issues associated with AWIPS functionality and staffing levels (including reductions) and NWS closure plans.
  • Analysis of the operational regional infrastructure of the NWS as it affects the cost of delivery services, with specific focus on the NWS plans to accelerate the closure of the Southern Region Headquarters.

VII. Recommendations and/or Options

  • Recommendation and/or options on levels of necessary resources necessary for FY 1998 and FY 1999 based upon the above analysis.
  • Recommendations and/or options identifying major areas of uncertainty associated with the end state of modernization which would affect cost and proposals on how to address the uncertainties.

Appendix B - RECOMMENDED BUDGET for FYs 1998 and 1999

Table 22 summarizes the NOAA Review recommendations. This table is provided in the budget account terms commonly used by NOAA/NWS in order to provide a quick reference for this report. The same information is provided in the official NOAA budget structure on the following pages.

Table 22 - Recommended NWS Budget

FY 1998 Budget Summary

Presented in Simplified Structure

Pres. Budget

NOAA Review

Delta

($ in thousands)
Operations and Research 
377,157  NWS BASE ** 
73,674  MARDI 
450,831  473,400  22,569  Subtotal O&R (BASE and MARDI) 
Systems 
50,968  49,216  (1,752)  NEXRAD 
9,835  9,695  (140)  ASOS
116,910  115,862  (1,048)  AWIPS/NOAAPort 
13,910  13,910  Central Computer 
191,623  188,683  (2,940)  Subtotal Systems
Facilities 
2,950  3,468  518  Facility Maintenance 
13,823  13,823  WFO Construction 
700  700  NCEP Construction 
17,473  17,991  518  Subtotal Facilities 
659,927  680,074  20,147  FY 1998 TOTAL 
 

FY 1999 Budget Summary

Presented in Simplified Structure

OMB Submit

NOAA Review

Delta

($ in thousands)
Operations and Research 
405,987  NWS BASE ** 
64,036  MARDI 
470,023  498,650  28,627  Subtotal O&R (BASE and MARDI) 
Systems 
54,954  47,516  (7,438)  NEXRAD 
11,971  12,111  140  ASOS
81,861  80,856  (1,005)  AWIPS/NOAAPort 
15,500  15,500  Central Computer 
164,286  155,983  (8,303)  Subtotal Systems
Facilities 
4,950  5,400  450  Facility Maintenance 
9,526  9,526  WFO Construction 
850  850  NCEP Construction 
15,326  15,776  450  Subtotal Facilities 
649,635  670,409  20,774  FY 1999 TOTAL 
** -- Local Forecasts and Warnings, Central Forecast Guidance, and Atmospheric and Hydrological Research 
 

A. - Budget Summary In Traditional NOAA Structure

Table 23 reflects the FY 1998 President's Budget in the NOAA budget structure format and compares it to the NOAA Review recommendations.

Table 23 - FY 1998 Budget in Traditional NOAA Structure

FY 1998 NOAA Budget Structure

Pres. Budget

NOAA Review

Delta

($ in thousands)

OPERATIONS, RESEARCH, & FACILITIES APPROPRIATION

Operations and Research
308,000  Local Warning & Forecasts + 
(Includes $10,794k Increase - see Table 25) 
73,674  MARDI 
910  Radiosonde Replacement + 
619  Susquehanna River Basin Flood System + 
35,596  Aviation Forecasts + 
418,799  Subtotal Local Forecasts &Warnings 
29,543  Central Forecast Guidance + 
2,489  Atmospheric and Hydrologic Research + 
450,831  473,400  22,569  Subtotal O&R (BASE and MARDI) 
+ Baseline items/activities/programs 

Systems Acquisition
39,591  38,174  (1,417)  NEXRAD 
5,341  5,341  ASOS 
AWIPS/NOAAPort 
8,000  8,000  Computer Facility Upgrades 
52,932  51,515  (1,417)  Subtotal Systems Acquisition 
503,763  524,915  21,152  Subtotal , NWS direct-Funded O&R 

Facilities
2,950  3,468  518  WFO Maintenance 
506,713  528,383  21,670  SubTOTAL, ORF 

CAPITAL ASSETS ACQUISITION APPROPRIATION

System Acquisition
11,377  11,042  (335)  NEXRAD 
4,494  4,354  (140)  ASOS
116,910  115,862  (1,048)  AWIPS/NOAAPort 
5,910  5,910  Central Computer 
138,691  137,168  (1,523)  Subtotal Systems Acquisition 

Construction
13,823  13,823  WFO Construction 
700  700  NCEP Construction 
14,523  14,523  Subtotal Construction 
153,214  151,691  (1,523)  SubTOTAL , CAA
659,927  680,074  20,147  TOTAL 
Table 24 reflects the FY 1999 OMB Submission in the NOAA budget structure format and compares it to the NOAA Review recommendations.

Table 24 - FY 1999 Budget in Traditional NOAA Structure

FY 1999 NOAA Budget Structure

OMB Submit

NOAA Review

Delta

($ in thousands)
OPERATIONS, RESEARCH, & FACILITIES APPROPRIATION 

Operations and Research
333,150  Local Warning & Forecasts + 
(Includes $25,150k Increase - see Table 26) 
64,036  MARDI 
4,590  Radiosonde Replacement + 
619  Susquehanna River Basin Flood System + 
35,596  Aviation Forecasts + 
437,991  Subtotal Local Forecasts &Warnings 
29,543  Central Forecast Guidance + 
2,489  Atmospheric and Hydrologic Research + 
470,023  498,650  28,627  Subtotal O&R (BASE and MARDI) 
+ = Baseline items/activities/programs 

Systems Acquisition
45,298  38,346  (6,952)  NEXRAD 
8,116  8,116  ASOS 
13,189  13,189  AWIPS/NOAAPort 
4,600  4,600  Computer Facility Upgrades 
71,203  64,251  (6,952)  Subtotal Systems Acquisition 
541,226  562,901  21,675  Subtotal , NWS direct-Funded O&R 

Facilities
4,950  5,400  450  WFO Maintenance 
546,176  568,301  22,125  SubTOTAL, ORF 

CAPITAL ASSETS ACQUISITION APPROPRIATION

System Acquisition
9,656  9,170  (486)  NEXRAD 
3,855  3,995  140  ASOS 
68,672  67,667  (1,005)  AWIPS/NOAAPort 
10,900  10,900  Central Computer 
93,083  91,732  (1,351)  Subtotal Systems Acquisition 

Construction
9,526  9,526  WFO Construction 
850  850  NCEP Construction 
10,376  10,376  Subtotal Construction 
103,459  102,108  (1,351) SubTOTAL , CAA
649,635  670,409  20,774  TOTAL 
 

B. - Summary of Program Increases in the Budget Structure

According to NOAA policy officials, the FY 1998 President's Budget only partially restored mandatory personnel pay raises and adjustments for real inflation, and leaves an un-funded residual of $15.65 million. In the FY 1999 OMB Submit, the un-funded residual is $11.76 million.

Table 25 and Table 26 reflect the Program Change Increases in the FY 1998 President's Budget and FY 1999 OMB Submit (associated with Local Forecasts and Warnings) and compares them to the NOAA Review recommendations.

Table 25 - FY 1998 PB - Program Increases

Pres. Budget

NOAA Review

Delta

($ in thousands)
6,655  BASE Restoration 
4,139 Mandatory Inflationary Costs Increases 
10,794  10,794  Total

Table 26 - FY 1999 OMB Submit - Program Increases

OMB Submit

NOAA Review

Delta

($ in thousands)
18,000 18,000  BASE Restoration 
1,650  (1,650)  MAROB
750  750  Lightning Data Network 
4,750  (4,750)  Advanced Hydrological Prediction System 
25,150  18,750  (6,400)  Subtotal, Program Increases 

New Initiatives, separately Identified under Local Forecasts and Warnings
3,680  4,000  320  Radiosonde Replacement Network 
(Increase of 3,680k over 910k - Total 4,590k) 
28,830  22,750  (6,080)  Total 
 

C. - NWS FTE Distributed By Funding Sources

Several sources provide funding for the FTE counted on NWS staffing rolls. Table 27 and Table 28 provide an overall summary. These tables reflect the FTEs contained in the FY 1998 President's Budget and the FY 1999 OMB Submission and compares them to the NOAA Review recommendations. It also compares each of these categories to the NWS FTE Streamlining Plan Targets for FY 1998 and FY 1999.

Table 29 and Table 30 show the distribution, in greater detail, within the NWS organizational structure.

Table 27 - NWS FY 1998 FTE Distribution

FY 1998 FTE Distribution

Pres.

NOAA

Funding Source

Budget

Review

Delta
BASE/MARDI  4521 4598 77 
Modernization Systems  219 219 0 
NWS Direct Funded FTE 4740  4817 77
Other Funding Sources  222 222 0 
TOTAL, NWS  4962 5039  77
FTE Streamlining Target  5070 5070
DELTA -108 -31  77
* In FY 1998, assumes that of the 373 FTE for Systems in the President's Budget, 219 FTE are allocated to the NWS and 154 FTE to other line offices; 

Table 28 - NWS FY 1999 FTE Distribution

FY 1999 FTE Distribution

OMB

NOAA

Funding Source

Submit

Review

Delta
BASE/MARDI  4401 4606 205 
Modernization Systems  211 211 0 
NWS Direct Funded FTE 4612  4817 205
Other Funding Sources  222 222 0 
TOTAL, NWS  4834 5039  205
FTE Streamlining Target  4809 4809
DELTA 25 230  205
* In FY 1999, assumes that of the 264 FTE for Systems in the OMB Submission, 211 FTE are allocated to the NWS and 53 FTE to other line offices 

Table 29 - FY 1998 Recommended FTEs by FMC and Account

Organization.

TOTAL

BASE

MARDI

FMAINT

ASOS

NEXRAD

AWIPS

FMP

REIMB

LINOFF

NIDS

NRCRVL

Headquarters
AA 94  82 0  0 0  0 13  0 0  0 0  0
OM 80 73  0 0  0 0  5 0  0 2  0 0 
OH 82  50 0  0 0  3 21  0 8  0 0  0
OSD 73 62  0 0  0 1  10 0 0  0 0  0
NWSTC 30  26 0  0 0  4 0  0 0  0 0  0
NDBC 33 33  0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0 
NCEP 371  366 2  0 0  0 1  0 0  2 0  0
CENTRAL  338 164 1  0 4  114 4 0  17 0 0  34
OSM 99  71 0  0 14  6 3  0 4  0 1  0
Subtotal HQ 1,200  927 3 0  18 128 56  0 29 5  1 34

Regional Headqtrs
East Region 45  44 0  0 1  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Southern Region  45 45 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Central Region 45  44 0  0 1  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Western Region  45 45 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Alaskan Region 35  34 0  0 1  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Pacific Region  24 22 0  0 0  0 0  0 3  0 0  0
Subtotal Regional HQ 239  234 0 0  3 0 0  0 3 0  0 0
Field 3,600 3,345 90 0  14 0 0  0 151 0  0 0
GRAND Total 5,039  4,506 93 0 35 128  56 0 183  5 1 34 

Table 30 - FY 1999 Recommended FTEs by FMC and Account

Organization.  TOTAL  BASE  MARDI  FMAINT  ASOS  NEXRAD  AWIPS  FMP  REIMB  LINOFF  NIDS  NRCRVL 

Headquarters
AA 94 82 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0
OM 80 73  0 0 5 0 0
OH 82 56 0 0 3 15 0 8 0 0
OSD 73 64  0 0 8 0 0
NWSTC 30  26 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
NDBC 33 33  0 0 0 0 0
NCEP 371  367 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
CENTRAL  338 164  1 4 114  4 17 0 34 
OSM 99  71 0 0 14 6 3 4 0 1 0
Subtotal HQ 1,200  935 3 0  18 128 48  0 29 5  1 34

Regional Headqtrs
East Region 45  44 0  0 1  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Southern Region  45 45 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Central Region 45  44 0  0 1  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Western Region  45 45 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Alaskan Region 35  34 0  0 1  0 0  0 0  0 0  0
Pacific Region  24 22 0  0 0  0 0  0 3  0 0  0
Sub-total Regional Hqs.  239  234 0 0  3 0 0  0 3 0  0 0
Field 3,600 3,368 67 0  14 0 0  0 151 0  0 0
GRAND Total 5,039  4,536 70 0 35 128  48 0 183  5 1 34 
 

D. - NWS Modernization Program Budget

Table 31 summarizes the Modernization Programs by funding account, Table 32 shows the funding totals for each Modernization System.

Table 31 - NWS Modernization Program Budgets by Account($K)

Line Item

FY 1998 Pres. Budget

FY 1998 NOAA Rvw

FY 1999 OMB Submit

FY 1999 NOAA Rvw

Capital Acquisition Account (CAA)
NEXRAD  11,377  11,042  9,656  9,170 
ASOS  4,494  4,354  3,855  3,995 
AWIPS  116,910  115,862  68,672  67,667 
Central Computer  5,910  5,910  10,900  10,900 

System Acquisition (ORF)
NEXRAD  39,591  38,174  45,298  38,346 
ASOS  5,341  5,341  8,116  8,116 
AWIPS  0  0  13,189  13,189 
CENTRAL COMPUTER  8,000  8,000  4,600  4,600 

Capital Acquisition Account (CAA)
WFO Construction  13,823  13,823  9,526  9,526 
NCEP Construction  700  700  850  850 

Facilities (ORF)
WFO Maintenance  2,950  3,468  4,950  5,400 
Total  209,096  206,674  179,612  171,759
Difference 

2,4